In this week's parasha, Yisro, Moshe's
father in law, came out to meet Moshe. He heard all about the
miracles of Yetzias Mitzraim, Kriyat Yam Suf and the victory of Bnei
Yisroel in the war against Amalek. This brought him to see the true
Power of Hashem over all the other 'gods' [Rashi
18:11].
The following day, Moshe sat to judge
Bnei Yisroel while everyone around him stood. Yisro was surprised at
what he saw. He rebuked Moshe, asking why he sat by himself while
others around him stood. Rashi
[18:13] comments, “He
sat like a king
while they all stood and this surprised Yisro, because
Moshe was not showing proper respect to Bnei Yisroel.”
The lashon accusing Moshe of sitting
like a “King” bothered me for a couple reasons: (a) Pirkei
Avos [1:4] says that a person should cling to the dirt of the
feet of Talmidei Chachamim. Rabbeinu Yonah
explains, “It was the way to honor Talmidei Chachamim - by standing
before them while they gave shuir or to sit on the ground [by their
feet] while Rebbeim sat on chairs.” (b) It says in the end of
Parashas Baha'alosecha [12:3,]
“And the man, Moshe, was humblest of all men.”
What was Yisro's claim on Moshe? Obviously he wasn't there to
disrespect Bnei Yisroel nor be treated like a king.
I
think the reason why Yisro rebuked Moshe was because he had a
different definition of what it meant to be humble: It says in the
end of Masechta Horios
that whenever a great Rabbi needed something fixed, the craftsman
would visit their house instead of making the Rabbi go to him. Rav
Yosef, however, didn't want to trouble the craftsman into making a
special trip for him, so he went over to the craftsman - even though
Rav Yosef knew he was a great Rabbi. That was Yisro's view on
humility; coming out of your comfort zone and putting yourself on a
similar level as others so that you don't give off that you're better
than them.
Moshe
on the other hand felt that a person can be humble and still know his
true value. Humility comes in different forms. Moshe wrote the Torah
thirteen times, which means he wrote the posuk of, “And
the man, Moshe, was humblest of all man” -
thirteen times! How do you think he felt while writing it? He knew it
was true, but does it contradict his humility? Just because Moshe was
humble, that doesn't mean he now has to sit on the floor while
drawing halachic conclusions and advising angry disputes.
I
realized there was a distinction of humility from the posuk (in this
week's parasha,) “Moshe's father-in- law, Yisro, came along... to
the desert where he was camped near the mountain of Hashem.” Rashi
[18:5] says that it was a praise of Yisro because he was living
amidst worldwide honor and yet his heart inspired him to go out into
the desert – for the purpose of learning Torah. Yisro wasn't a
regular civilian, he was a King! Besides the fact it showed how
amazed he was since he came out to greet Moshe, (as opposed to Moshe
going to meet the King,) but he left his 'comfort zone' and came into
the desert for the sake of Torah. He didn't show that he was better
than others by sending messengers to bring Moshe all the way to
Midyan. So when he saw Moshe sitting like a king, he felt that was
not humility. Moshe then explained to him that he was judging Bnei
Yisroel and therefore halacha was that the people should stand while
the Judge or Rabbi sat, to show (another form of) kavod haTorah.
Have a wonderful
Shabbos,
Nisso
Nisso
No comments:
Post a Comment